Same melody but texturally different every time.It's popular because it's VERY easy to digest, and it introduces musical ideas to non-music-background to people that helps engage them and feel like they have an understanding of how things are developing.New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be castWhether you're a musician, a newbie, a composer or a listener, welcome. Most music people (performers, composers, conductors etc) don't hate it, it's just that the rest of his music is so ridiculously well-composed that it doesn't shine so much next to the rest.You're not alone. Rachel Portman Strauss., which would … That's it! Same melody but texturally different every time.It's popular because it's VERY easy to digest, and it introduces musical ideas to non-music-background to people that helps engage them and feel like they have an understanding of how things are developing.New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be castWhether you're a musician, a newbie, a composer or a listener, welcome. The site may not work properly if you don't If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit Press J to jump to the feed. best.

I'd much rather listen to Bolero than Daphnes.Bolero is an étude for orchestra... Ravel was just demonstrating how to provide contrast through textural changes.

C trombones were available and used at least sporadically in France back in the days of this piece’s premier. Yeah, as a fellow classical saxophonist, Bolero, Pictures, and Rhapsody in Blue were my only times with an orchestra.Harry Janos, L'Arsienne, Lieutenant Kiji, On the Town, Alexander Nevsky...I like it.

WRONG.

I don't hate it, but basically everything else is better. As evidence, Lanford cites Ravel's admissions that the rhythms of Boléro were inspired by the machines of his father's factory and melodic materials came from a berceuse sung to Ravel at nighttime by his mother. Bolero. The most obvious criticism of Boléro is Bolero. Ravel decided instead to write a brand new piece instead, and Bolero was premiered in 1928 at the Paris Opera with a small ballet staged to the piece. 3 I wonder how he’s feeling right now. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts Don't make anything more of it.At least it's not as bad as Bolero with the melody removed, and yes that is a thing.I actually love it. It's the same melody repeated 18 times, on different orchestral instruments, with a nice little harmony pattern underneath. Would … It constitutes an experiment in a very special and limited direction and should not be suspected of aiming at achieving other or more than it actually does.”Yet although Ravel considered Boléro one of his least important works, it has always been his most popular. The whole piece is also one loooooong crescendo, basically getting slightly louder and louder each minute. When Ravel was told of this, he reportedly replied: “That lady… she understood.”In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, he said: “I am particularly desirous there should be no misunderstanding about this work. [crosstalk 00:07:01] Jad Abumrad: Robert says he's not quite sure how it happened, but at some point that year, Anne heard this famous piece by Maurice Ravel, became obsessed, couldn't stop listening to it.

Just a random thought I had while listening to some of his waltzes for piano on Performance Today. He picked a nice melody and stuck to it with tiny changes in orchestration.

As a saxophonist, I'm supposed to like it because it's basically the only piece I've been hired to play thus far.Ha! "Did you ever do it to Ravel's Boléro?" Ravel called it "orchestral tissue without music" before its premiere performance.Yeah, I remember reading that somewhere. Commissioned by the Russian dancer Ida Rubinstein, Boléro was first performed at the Paris Opéra on November 22, 1928, with a dance choreographed by Bronislava … Jad Abumrad: Bolero. Popularity has nothing to do with the work itself.

From Beethoven to Ravel, and Elgar to Saint-Saëns, 10 of the best-known pieces that their composers disowned despite – or perhaps because of – their popularlity Most music people (performers, composers, conductors etc) don't hate it, it's just that the rest of his music is so ridiculously well-composed that it doesn't shine so much next to the rest.You're not alone. So you’d think Ravel would have been really proud – chuffed, even – that one of his works was recognised around the world, right? It's by definition created by average people who listen to certain pieces for If you view it as an orchestral showpiece it becomes more about displaying the talents of soloists and becomes more engrossing IMOIts a bit of a "one-trick pony" An impressive experience the first time you see (hear) it but after that there is no point in repeating it.Another analogy would be its like repeating a joke you have already heard.I don't know who "we" is, but personally I like it. 105 comments. He hated it. But on his return Ravel discovered that the orchestration rights had been granted to the Spanish conductor Enrique Arbós. However it's subtleties are wasted-on/ignored by the string players that have to slug thru the counting or the T-bone player hoping to make his entrance convincing...As I recall from college days, Bolero and the Seasons were stepping stones to classical … Why it is so popular, I will never know.Edit: my phone auto added the accent on étude... Not sure if I feel fancy or pretentiousMy understanding is it is about colors. Ravel

The film — Blake Edwards's 10 (1979) — was so successful that it made Boléro one of the most expensive musical numbers to license for use in future movies, earning a million dollars a year for the composer's estate. Robert Adams: Yes, yeah. Initially, Ravel did not expect Bolero to be played often; he thought the piece was not worth much and good orchestras would not spend their time on it. best top new …