So what is the unstoppable force that haunts all the characters in the novel? Chigurh is an extremely evil individual with no conscience. When she goes upstairs, she finds The scene is an imaginative microcosm of a world in which porous altruism is always threatened by caustic antisociality. Moreover, the opening scene of There was this boy I sent to the ‘lectric chair at Huntsville Hill a while back … Papers said it was a crime of passion but he told me there wasn’t any passion to it.

When they arrive, they realize that the burned car belonged to the man Anton Chigurh lacks a clear personal history, and is often described in the novel as looking exotic because of his… (read full character analysis) Bell tells him he knows how The buildup creates a screeching dissonance between the triviality, peace, and insignificance of the setting and circumstance, on the one hand, and the sense of sudden, unmotivated fatality on the other.

He perceives himself as the arbiter of fate, and operates outside of conventional understandings of justice and morality.

He kills people even when his contract doesn't require it, but because he feels they are accountable. Chigurh represents the antithesis of this attitude, and it shows in his nonconformist appearance and lack of adjustment. In the first chapter, Sheriff Bell rambles on about how "somewhere out there is a true and living prophet of destruction and I dont want to confront him. Anton Chigurh (/ ʃ ɪ ˈ ɡ ɜːr /) is a fictional character and the main antagonist of Cormac McCarthy's novel No Country for Old Men, and its film adaptation, in which he is portrayed by Spanish actor Javier Bardem.. The Sheriff represents for the viewer an empathic anchorpoint, an involved perspective through which to apprehend the evil of Chigurh. Given that he is sociopathic, Chigurh feels no compassion for his victims who are begging for their lives. “This is absolutely THE best teacher resource I have ever purchased.

The fundamental sociomoral schism between Anton Chigurh and Ed Tom Bell explored in the film explains what Tyrer and Nickell, in their analysis of No Country (2009), see as Chigurh’s enigmatic but palpable “archetypicality” (91). And then one day there is an accounting.

Chigurh has instilled in the boys the antisocial motivations of greed and envy while also criminalizing them with his bribe (“you didn’t see me”).
...works for people who won’t give up on finding the money.

...to look it up. Chigurh picks up on one such flaw that the viewer understands to be especially egregious because of the killer’s sudden choking upon hearing it: the proprietor, he learns, has “married into” his current business. Such an altruistic act would represent the inclusion of the killer into a virtual community, a “we” whose individual interests agglomerate in the collective (Hornstein 1978). Beyond their duties as deputies, these men offer support for Bell as he struggles to face the gruesome violence that has occurred in their community. They're like having in-class notes for every discussion!” When the man turns in his chair, he asks Wells if he would know The murderous rampages were led by the devil himself.


Regarding the second point, (a) Chigurh killed based on a coin toss and (b) not all the people he killed can be considered immoral.

We see this after Moss has injured the killer’s leg with a shotgun volley outside the hotel where they first meet. Chigurh addresses one of the boys:In this scene, for the first and last time in the film, we see a visibly shaken Chigurh.